Your search did not yield any results

Site Pages

Dr. Galv KnowledgeBase

News

Bridges can be subjected to factors like poor drainage, heavy road deicing, or environmental influences that can contribute to accelerated corrosion. One preventative solution utilized by bridge owners is to periodically remove the debris and wash bridges off with water. This removes damp vegetation and clears away chlorides leftover from road salting.

Bridge washing is usually performed annually or on a 2-5 year cycle. Clean, fresh water used at various pressures to remove sand, dirt, gravel, dead vegetation, pollution, and chlorides/de-icing agents. Spring is the typical time of year for bridge washing as residual de-icing agents from the winter are removed. Despite limited empirical data, DOTs who perform bridge washing report it is beneficial and extends the service life of all bridges exposed to de-icing agents. Further, NSBA’s Uncoated Weathering Steel (UWS) Reference Guide formally recommends bridge washing depending on the environment and use of de-icing materials: “washing and cleaning of UWS components should be part of a larger bridge preservation program”. See also AGA’s article HDG vs. Uncoated Weathering Steel (UWS).

Table 1: Maximum Water Pressure for Washing Types of Steel Bridges

UWS

6,000 PSI

HDG

1,450 PSI

Painted Steel

Contact paint manufacturer

In North America, bridge washing programs are more common in the Northeast and Midwest regions where de-icing agents are more frequently used. While washing usually focuses on decks, bearings, and drainage systems, it is occasionally extended to include girder-ends and substructures. As of 2024, twenty two DOTs report they perform bridge washing. Of these, only seven of those DOTs report washing more than 50% of their bridges.

If needed, it is possible to consider the relative impact of these maintenance costs in a life-cycle cost analysis. Although there is no industry consensus on the cost of sweeping and bridge washing, a mixture of anecdotal reports and public records indicate the cost for third-party services is approximately $1/sq-ft of deck area. When utilizing internal maintenance crew teams, sweeping and bridge washing average costs are reported to be lower such as approximately $650/bridge.

To assist in calculating the relative impact of bridge washing recommendations on life cycle cost, the AGA offers a new cost calculator which considers the bridge size and two different maintenance cycles.

Description Inputs Units
Bridge Deck: Length feet
Bridge Deck: Width feet
Design Life
years
Inflation
%
Interest Rate
%
Number of Bridges bridges
Description Outputs Units
Cost of Bridge Washing
(Annual Maintenance Cycle)
$0.00 Initial Cost per Bridge Washing
$0.00 Net Future Value (NFV)
$0.00 Net Present Value (NPV)
Cost of Bridge Washing
(2-Year Maintenance Cycle)
$0.00 Initial Cost per Bridge Washing
$0.00 Net Future Value (NFV)
$0.00 Net Present Value (NPV)

Example Bridge

Lane Ave 3

For projects where bridge maintenance costs are considered, obtain information about the specific bridge deck size and design life for a quick analysis. If analyzing a bridge bundling project (assuming multiple bridges similar in design and size), it is recommended to identify the average bridge deck size and quantity of bridges. Afterwards, results from the bridge washing calculations can be used to demonstrate costs over the life-cycle when accounting for annual or biannual washing.

In this generic example, the cost of each bridge washing maintenance activity is approximately $41,440 (in today’s dollars) assuming the use of third-party contractors. It is assumed many bridge owners outsource this maintenance activity, but not all. Over a design life of 70 years, the cost of annual sweeping and washing increases the life-cycle cost by approximately $2.1 million in today’s dollars.

Lane Ave Bridge Case Study
The effect of washing the bridge annually versus every two years on life cycle cost.

Are you still looking for the right answer? Ask an Expert